Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
That's a brilliant suggestion, and I can't believe I didn't think of it myself! You're absolutely right. However, six is a bit too few; at least eight would be better.
Well, that's something we can discuss. Let's assume that someone fundamentally doesn't play Heroes 4 because they don't consider it a proper Heroes game. And their computer can't handle Heroes 5. But they participate in the Kanigam stages for Heroes 1, 2, and 3. Why should we exclude such people (like vbn, for example) from being potential contenders for prize-winning places in the "Universal" category? Three versions are more than two – that should be enough. And 6 stages are more than half of all the stages for Heroes 1. In my opinion, that's acceptable. And imagine the intense competition that could result! And notice – personally, this proposal isn't beneficial for me, but I'm still suggesting it and voting for this calculation of prize winners for the "Universal" category.