Isn't this a preference for the 4th installment?

What does "preference" have to do with it? I'm saying that all versions of Heroes are playable and interesting. But I'm also saying that the 4th installment differs specifically in its gameplay, and not in a bad way. It has many innovations that significantly distinguish it from other versions, but that doesn't mean I only want to play it. I started with WarLords and K_Bounty, and I also consider them playable.

It's not about what's here and what's there. It's about you, i.e., I want to say that it's about your fondness for the 4th installment. You play all the versions, but you shouldn't say that they're all equally enjoyable for you.

Well, you're a strange person :) How can they not be equally enjoyable if I play all the versions with pleasure?

You just think that these "innovations," as you call them, have a more positive impact on the game, and I think differently – that's just a matter of opinion, and we could really discuss it endlessly, but what's the point?

Those who only play certain versions and refuse to play others, or who have played them a couple of times and decided they don't like them, usually reason this way about innovations. But for me, all versions of Heroes are just Heroes.

You did read the title of the topic, and each of us has expressed their opinion – some are supporters, and some are opponents, and that's it. Why complicate things?

I'm not a supporter of anything, but I'm also not an opponent. Play all the versions and achieve certain results in each of them, and then you'll understand what makes each one good