[Tournaments-HotA] Game of Thrones - 2

1) All issues will be resolved by the coordinator, who will be chosen by the team. 2) The replacement procedure is described in the rules. Are you suggesting that a player from the reserve should be placed in the second team to replace a missing player? (And this option is available, if needed.) 3) 19 games were already played in the final match. Do you need the teams to play 100 games? 4) They would still receive those losses if no one from their team replaced them. If you can't agree with someone, there is the ODD procedure. Or you can inform the coordinator/captain of the opposing team about this. 1) As practice has shown, the team doesn't know who their coordinator will be until they get to know each other better, and they don't ask for input on the choice. Later, the team cannot influence him in any way; if the captain is absent, and the team's opinion is given little weight, the coordinator makes all the decisions based on the principle of "I DECIDED SO" (this has been proven in practice). 2) The replacement procedure is very complicated, and it's difficult to find a player with a rating and skill level that are significantly different. Here, there is more reliance on the coordinator to ensure that one player doesn't play for two. This also takes a lot of time, which some people may not have, and the moral pressure is higher due to the responsibility. 3) No one is asking for 100 games; there's no need to exaggerate. In the final, 18 games were played, and the score was 9-9, which means a reset and the start of a new stage! The final stage was played in a best-of-one format. No sport has a rule where a single point decides the outcome; always, an odd number of games is used, or there should be a difference of two points (e.g., shootouts, penalties, volleyball). There are many examples. This issue was decided by the coordinator because the captain was absent, and the team's opinion was completely opposite to the coordinator's decision. And this is a fact! 4) You can agree with anyone if the person is willing to compromise, but there are: a) those who delay until the last moment, avoiding it in every possible way without specifying a specific time and date, thus dragging it out until the last days of the deadline. After the ODD is assigned, decisions are made based on the results of the unfinished game; b) when the ODD is assigned, the responsible participant, who has tried many times to agree on a game, may simply not have time...., and this will then be a disadvantage for him. Is this fair? It's an open question.