Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Changes to the rules starting with the letter G (Graal and Galtran).
Limiting Galtran is foolishness; it's just an out-of-game balance change. He will simply change, and that's it. Castle on Jebus Cross, even in SOD, I rate about the same as one branch. Now ban upgrading to Archangels? I am generally in favor of choosing heroes and for Conflux!
I fully support Hell regarding Galtran. Many players trade for Castle and Dungeon immediately for 10k, especially against Inferno or Tower — and that's not even mentioning Necro. As Tvarina correctly said on stream, a 10k trade on Jebus Cross is no more than a 1-2 day tempo loss!
Added after 3 minutes FireToSky
For the second CIS tournament in a row, we've been discussing Grail abuse for hours. I believe that specifically on Mini-Nost, it is dug up in half the games, unbalancing the dynamics of that template. Conclusion — it needs fixing
On Smka, the Grail is also dug up in half the games. So, should we choose templates to ban the Grail? When you dig up the Grail, it feels like you picked a max-utopia and got KZ, Wings, and +15 All! Against banning the Grail!