=Lizard=
Auto-translated
Are you kidding? The discussion about the Grail has been going on in the AC section for about 1.5 years, maybe even 2. We can't reach a consensus at all. All this time, there have been complaints from different players, and not only Reddy has been digging into it.
Why pour so much water on the topic "but in HotA..."? The question was asked quite specifically. Well, in SoD there is no way to physically ban heroes, but we have to live with it somehow? :smile45: And for Conflux they start and catch imba heroes - that's fine, they live normally. For Tower you can catch Kyrre, and for Castle - Gunnar, well, there they change the starting hero in 90% of cases. I personally take a philosophical approach to the question of "catching something at the start", you can catch Goshhan in the tavern, or you can get an external dwelling of minotaurs behind the Dungeon, that's just how it is, everyone catches something when the map is generated (for mirror templates, the philosophy is different, of course)
This is precisely the stumbling block that caused the discussion. After all, we're not playing anarchy.
I was talking, of course, about catching Galtran specifically with 2-3 stacks at the start when playing as Necro. This discredits both the bidding and the restrictions at the same time. Ideally, a fixed 1 stack at the start for Galtran would remove all questions entirely.
As for the second point, I don't understand the connection at all :confused:. How does anarchy relate to the essence of the bidding? (the clarity and transparency of what you are bidding for).
p.s. In Conflux, a random hero is also nonsense. And also - due to the introduction of bidding into the game. Well, let them give 5K for Luna, well, let them give 10K. But then - definitely for Luna. And not 2300 for "what if it's Luna, what if it's Grindan".