I'm definitely not going to discuss 12 paragraphs, of which I only agree with the wording of the third. :smile11:
And, just to reiterate, the third point is purely theoretical. In words, everything sounds nice about respect, but in reality, questions arise.
And isn't it obvious why they arise?
For example. If a subject (let's call him W) considers it important that there is no aggressive language, he will focus on this in the first place. But for the second subject (let's call him L), the semantic content is the most important thing. And so, W and L communicate. And if W ignores the semantic content that L is trying to convey, again and again, then no matter how politely W expresses himself, L will still feel that W does not consider him a person (does not respect him). And even if W has not received aggressive language from L for some time before this, he will soon receive it, and he may even think that the problem is only with L, because W has been doing everything "correctly" (politely). This is also true in reverse (only not about meanings, but about "being polite").
In the end, in theory, everything sounds nice about respect, but in practice, due to different values, it still turns out like this: :smile35: