Forum

I'm subtly, but persistently, hinting that there are other people with different opinions. And outside of HW, people also play "Heroes." :) And I suggested creating a universal tool. Or is that still unclear?

Everything seems clear. But...
This doesn't change the fact that your opinion (unfortunately) is incorrect, far from reality, and in this case, you are probably just wasting your time. :smile43:
A universal tool has been created. It's the HW rating. Join in.
I might be wrong, and we can discuss it, but you'll need to provide at least some arguments first.

What Dirty wrote is approximately how the rating should be perceived.
Everyone can define the groups a little differently for themselves.
For example, I call the 1550-1700 range "average," and 1700-1850 "strong, versatile players of the second tier."
Above 1850 are the top players and the elite. Below 1550 are various types of beginners, noobs, or experienced, even strong, but inconsistent players.
But you can argue about these words endlessly, and there's no point in it. What's more important is the general feeling that the rating works, that the rating (overall) is confirmed in practice.