[7:17:34 PM] *** Jerk of all trades has left ***
not in contacts
0 messages from him to me in the last two weeks
1. Picking at an innocuous message in a classic know-it-all tone - ✓.
2. Being rude in response to a neutral, disagreeing message - ✓.
3. Resorting to personal attacks and accusing the other person of stupidity - ✓.
4. Accusing the other person of some fabricated mortal sins in order to sway the balance of public opinion in his favor - ✓.
5. Retreating and defensively shutting down in all directions after being asked to explain a specific point - ✓.
How is this possible? Is this yet another of the DOZENS of classic cases where Plesen makes some controversial statement with a claim to general knowledge that doesn't require proof, and when asked to clarify, he hides in a dark corner? Has something like this ever happened before???
Abstracting from the entire conversation and dissecting my text into quotes, as was fashionable in internet arguments in 2008-2010, when I was 14-20 years old - I asked him to specifically clarify about Tengro. In my opinion, within the framework of this discourse, this is a rather serious accusation - to accuse someone of bullying and driving a user to despair, with whom he didn't even communicate. I believe I have the moral right to do this, don't I? Regardless of whether I am right or wrong in this conversation, no matter how easy or difficult it may be for us to communicate, I believe I have every right to demand an explanation for this serious accusation.
But unfortunately, Plesen's infantilism has reached a new low here. In fact, his entire position can be expressed in his own quote:
It's not that I can't, I just don't want to answer if I don't feel like it? Oh, yes, it's you who forced me.
Thank you all for your attention, it was not difficult for me, and I even enjoyed writing this post while finishing a chocolate cake and drinking green tea. I hope you also received at least some minimal entertainment on this очередной not particularly eventful day in the chat.