"Redbeard's Cup"

The suggestion regarding judging was considered. KillandAction wanted to be both a judge and a participant simultaneously. Unfortunately, a person cannot be both a judge and a participant at the same time; this contradicts the very essence of the competition. If this is present in some championships, I believe it is incorrect. A judge should be as impartial as possible and not have any interest in any particular player.

KillandAction, with all due respect, did not familiarize himself with the mod review. Here, the phrase "I hear the bell, but I don't know where it is" applies. Thank you, Magog, for explaining things to KillandAction.

What does the mod have to do with it? I'm talking about the rules.
The more clearly you write them, the fewer questions and interpretations there will be.
If the judges don't want specifics in the rules, that's their choice. Just be prepared for controversial situations in which you won't be able to make an objective decision.
I specifically watched the stream about the rules, but I didn't get a definitive answer about the rules, hence the questions.
I'll say this right away: don't be offended, BUT if someone takes a principled approach to defending their interests, according to the written rules, situations may arise that the judges will not be able to resolve fairly due to gaps in the rules.

And there are also techniques in the game that, within the context of the rules of this tournament, allow you to do things that judges/participants may find unacceptable because the rules of this tournament are somewhat vague and not clearly defined.
But in any case, it is up to the organizers and judges of this tournament to decide whether or not to adjust the rules.