Well, it’s understandable that the concept of utility wasn’t feasible at that time, but what about now? Are you simply sure that the balance between the negative and positive aspects should correspond to each other, or is this just a “test,” and the precise balance will be adjusted over time, like, “time will tell”? Or is this already the final version of the “Morale System”? Maybe 1:5 would be better? Or maybe 1:2? What considerations led you to make this decision? I don’t want to be annoying :), but I’m genuinely curious.

Sincerely.