chudo_ud0
Auto-translated
Let's break it down: you have one game to finish, plus 1-2 tiebreakers, which could mean a total of 3 games. Or am I wrong?
Let's continue: 2 weeks have passed, and 3 players who took 1st place (and one of them only played 2 games) are waiting. And as long as one of the 3 pairs hasn't finished playing, there won't be a draw, right? That's at least another 2 weeks (all 3 pairs are unlikely to finish in one game, although there's a small chance, but it's less likely that at least one pair will play 2 games). And your pair adds up to a potential 3 weeks. So, 2 weeks (already passed) + 1-2-3 (average of 2 weeks) equals 4-5 weeks. Do you understand, or not? Where exactly is the mistake?
P.S. Please, don't explain the rules to me 10 times; I understood them a long time ago.
I think the extra game isn't a very good indicator. It would be better to get rid of this indicator in future tournaments. If a draw can't be held without it, then playing to 2 wins would still resolve the issue. I suggest holding the draw now so that, for example, the winner of your game with GL plays against someone else, and so on. Then, the winner of that pair plays against another, and so on. This way, players who finish earlier can play without waiting.
For example, the winner of Kila - GL plays against Bot, and then goes on to play against Brodyaga, etc. (random draw)
Let's continue: 2 weeks have passed, and 3 players who took 1st place (and one of them only played 2 games) are waiting. And as long as one of the 3 pairs hasn't finished playing, there won't be a draw, right? That's at least another 2 weeks (all 3 pairs are unlikely to finish in one game, although there's a small chance, but it's less likely that at least one pair will play 2 games). And your pair adds up to a potential 3 weeks. So, 2 weeks (already passed) + 1-2-3 (average of 2 weeks) equals 4-5 weeks. Do you understand, or not? Where exactly is the mistake?
P.S. Please, don't explain the rules to me 10 times; I understood them a long time ago.
I think the extra game isn't a very good indicator. It would be better to get rid of this indicator in future tournaments. If a draw can't be held without it, then playing to 2 wins would still resolve the issue. I suggest holding the draw now so that, for example, the winner of your game with GL plays against someone else, and so on. Then, the winner of that pair plays against another, and so on. This way, players who finish earlier can play without waiting.
For example, the winner of Kila - GL plays against Bot, and then goes on to play against Brodyaga, etc. (random draw)