You just need to calculate it... and consider all the options.

Well, if a player always has a successful performance, then they won't have anything to fear. But the idea that: the worse you perform, the more you get, and vice versa... is incorrect. With each tournament, the rating will decrease if the performance gets worse and worse.

However, you didn't comment on the example with the player Zingel. Therefore, I cannot be sure that the Prophet would constantly hold first place. Let him come and prove with his gameplay each time that I am wrong. Well, anything can happen in the game. By the way, I think Zingel gave me a hard time that time. These are the twists of fate. By the way, Kyle too. However, he didn't play in the 6th stage. And so what? Following your logic, he should just be given a hundred points. If he had been in the stage, would his result have been among the leaders? Or would he have been near Zingel again? It's unlikely that anything can be said definitively here.