Auto-translated
In reality, the criteria for determining the "best" are quite vague, so it's more accurate to perceive this nomination as an award for audience sympathy, where everyone evaluates the participants based on the criteria that are important to them: victories/results, skill, organizational work, activity on the forum, etc.
The fact that in 2017 there was a significant increase in the number of newcomers and interest among forum participants in this nomination compared to the previous one
/topic/12217/is already a big plus :smile13: