Armageddets
Auto-translated
If a person can choose leaders for themselves, they vote for them. But if they consider them to be more or less equal and worthy competitors, they will either vote for everyone or for no one. This won't change anything. It's much fairer than when a person votes for someone out of friendship and is a vested party. Isn't that right?
Voting is also one of the methods for each participant to feel like they are important to the community and that they have an influence on something.
Regarding the fairness of voting. When the entire community votes, we only learn its opinion – no more, no less. But if specific points and criteria for determining the winner were defined in advance, there would be no need to vote at all. The calculations would be done based on them, and that would be it. But these are completely different things.
Voting is also one of the methods for each participant to feel like they are important to the community and that they have an influence on something.
Regarding the fairness of voting. When the entire community votes, we only learn its opinion – no more, no less. But if specific points and criteria for determining the winner were defined in advance, there would be no need to vote at all. The calculations would be done based on them, and that would be it. But these are completely different things.
Ютуб канал со стримами, обучениями, новостями, шоу-турнирами с призовыми
Огромная пополняемая сборка игр разных игроков
Твитч канал
Гудгейм канал
Группа Вконтакте
Беседа для поиска соперников в ICQ (460+ человек) - ICQ Heroes 3 Chat (460+ peoples)
https://icq.com/chat/AoLCp9xL2UAnLZKubgc
По вопросам организации и спонсорства шоу турниров с полным освещением писать в ЛС
Финансовая поддержка
