Grando
Auto-translated
Damn. Well, yeah. ) I wrote such a "convincing and unambiguous" text above that I was already expecting a backlash. :D
Somewhere, it had to turn out that I was wrong. It's actually good that the backlash came so quickly.
Indeed. There was no need to check the second path at all. Does the first path from the start to the center exist? Yes. Is there a Guard outpost in the passage? No. That's already point A. :D
However, I will stick to my opinion that at least both of them messed up. And as of the end of turn 112, both still had doubts. And for a blitz strategy, this is forgivable.
From Jelen's side, the ideal course of action would have been to immediately make a save, take another turn 112, and exit as soon as a controversial moment arose.
From the "kamikaze" player's side, the ideal course of action would have been to immediately tell the opponent to make a save on turn 112 as soon as he voiced the controversial question.
Neither of them could figure this out, and both players made this mistake.
The mistake – writing in the after-game chat, already having all the information – was made by only one player. Of those who expressed their opinions, I am closest to Lucky's point of view – "some kind of wild aggression." And this is what caused my sharp reaction above.
Somewhere, it had to turn out that I was wrong. It's actually good that the backlash came so quickly.
Indeed. There was no need to check the second path at all. Does the first path from the start to the center exist? Yes. Is there a Guard outpost in the passage? No. That's already point A. :D
However, I will stick to my opinion that at least both of them messed up. And as of the end of turn 112, both still had doubts. And for a blitz strategy, this is forgivable.
From Jelen's side, the ideal course of action would have been to immediately make a save, take another turn 112, and exit as soon as a controversial moment arose.
From the "kamikaze" player's side, the ideal course of action would have been to immediately tell the opponent to make a save on turn 112 as soon as he voiced the controversial question.
Neither of them could figure this out, and both players made this mistake.
The mistake – writing in the after-game chat, already having all the information – was made by only one player. Of those who expressed their opinions, I am closest to Lucky's point of view – "some kind of wild aggression." And this is what caused my sharp reaction above.