Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.
It seems I've grasped the essence of the claim. In my opinion, the key phrase here is:
At that moment, neither Jelen117 nor I knew the exact interpretation of the rules.
because it significantly diminishes the weight of the argument.
At the same time, I asked Jelen several times in the chat if he wanted to take a restart, and each time I received a negative answer.
because it's unclear whether you were talking about the same thing or something different. Perhaps Jelen117 meant that he didn't want to take a subjective restart but wanted to request a technical restart. At the very least, his subsequent actions (leaving the game and immediately contacting the judge) suggest this.
However, it's still necessary to hear the opinions of the opponent and the judge.