Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

According to my system, in stage 4 of the competition, I would have received 50.37 points, which is 23.1 more than you. You, as a great expert on stage 4, claim that this is unfair. Let's say it is, but let's consider stage 6. Due to the ease and speed of the map, you confidently give yourself 70 rating points for completing it, which is easier and faster than even 11 days on stage 4. According to my system, for an average completion and a place closer to the end of the tournament table, you would have received 45.33 points, which is 24.67 fewer "free" points. And who else has such a system where it's so easy to get points?!

Definitely, it's in yours. There weren't many strong players in stage 4, but a result of 3 days is, in my opinion, the limit (why should my rating be lowered because of the strength of the tournament – how would this affect my result in days? Who would try to complete that map in two days?). You were 11-3=7 DAYS behind the leader. In stage 6, there were many strong players for this version. I was 10-7=3 DAYS behind the leader. What more proof do you need? Your system only proves once again how the placement in offline tournaments is flawed, depending on the presence or absence of players of a certain level. Nevertheless, even though we messed up in stage 6, we weren't as far behind the leader in days as you were in stage 4. You were just lucky that there were no more players in stage 4. And I was unlucky that they were in stage 6. That's all there is to it. Luck is NOT OUR METHOD :)

Added 7 minutes ago

I wasn't participating in the discussion back then, so it's not about me.
The million-dollar question: "Then who is it about?" :D

Here's an answer for a ruble. AmberSoler, when leaving this discussion, wrote:
-------------
I think it's not worth getting hung up on.
All possible calculation options that do not take into account the place (or similar parameters) turn out to be quite cumbersome, difficult to understand intuitively, and inconvenient to use. In essence, Iron's option is the optimum in terms of simplicity, clarity, and relative accuracy. If we assume that the average tournament does not have large gaps between the leader, then, with the condition of abandoning the place, this method can be left as a working one...

No "simple" modifications can be applied to this calculation option, because we immediately go in the direction of the same problems that we want to avoid.
--------------

But new figures have appeared in the form of new system developers. And now everyone is saying in unison that it's not their fault :)

The problem is that you can't come up with a FLAWLESS system that would take into account the place, because in the offline game of Heroes, this is simply IMPOSSIBLE :)

Added 55 minutes ago

Should they be responsible for the map's features???

It is the direct responsibility of the players to be responsible for the map's features. EVERYONE plays on the same map in the tournament. In another tournament, there is another map, but again, its features are the same for all participants in that tournament.

Who did you beat among the strong players in stage 4? If we introduce a coefficient for him, almost everyone would be left without a rating.

I asked you first :) Who am I supposed to beat? Find me a person who can complete the map of stage 4 in two days, and I will close the issue and agree with your arguments. And again, I ask you - who among the strong players did you personally beat in stage 4? I answered you :)

and you clicked on my iron beak twice more.

Kyle wrote that you are resorting to personal attacks. However, he gave you wings for this post. There is a clear bias of the moderator towards a forum participant (me) because he shares your point of view on the rating system and does not share mine. In that case, click on your own hare's beak :)

First place should be better than several hundredths

PROVIDED that the players being compared have played the same number of tournaments, at least :)

It's your right, but I hope there won't be a general vote, and the administration will decide for itself.

Let them decide, what's the big deal?