Skip to content
#7901
Auto-translated
The rule "point number zero" itself is absolutely correct. There is absolutely no need for such nonsense (by the way, a read-only account would be banned for 2-3 months for such words).
And this "point number zero" needs to be activated in practice precisely because of one game. The question is whether there is a good reason to activate it.

For example, the latest bugs in 1.40 – "Gelu in the tavern" and "rebuilding in the dungeon" – are force majeure, bugs, and these are valid reasons to apply this rule and make amendments to the tournament regulations as needed. Because they didn't announce the "dungeon" issue in time, we got the same problem again. And what do we do now? We sit and think. The problem objectively exists, it ruins games, and anyone can be affected.

But in Mirrors, it was a non-critical change in the rules that somehow interferes with the gameplay. Moreover, only Vicc seemed to see the "importance" of the problem, and opinions differed on whether to do something or not, and if so, what exactly. And even when everyone had their say, Vicc still somehow failed to read and understand what people were writing the first time. This is where the "public outrage" came from. Because almost everyone didn't understand why anything needed to be done at all, and the rest didn't understand why, if something had to be done, it had to be done in that particular way.
If this is abused again and again, the consequences will probably, sooner or later, be as Hell wrote.
https://www.twitch.tv/grando__