Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The Activity column indicates the participant's activity. That is, how many Tournaments a person has played in this version, as Mr. Botinki correctly explained.
Let's assume we calculate the rating for Heroes 3, taking activity into account. There is a player who has played only one game and has become a leader, gaining 100 points, and Botinki hasn't played and doesn't plan to. Even Dmitry AS will hardly overtake him in this rating. If you are going to reset all ratings next year, it still won't be easier for Dmitry AS this year :) because, as a result, he loses in the final rating, and precisely because he was more active. Kamikaze, what do you have to say about this in your system? In my opinion, simple summation better reflects activity. And if a player is very active, then he can certainly overtake Dmitry AS, if the latter plays only once for 100. But who will be to blame in this case - AS, for not playing actively. In your version, an active player has a higher chance of losing to an inactive player (who just got lucky once)