Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

I believe the bonus should be larger, and it should exist in the first place – if a participant overtakes players in the final standings who are (or were) ranked higher than them in the overall ranking, and that's based on this particular version. Because HOMM3 and HOMM4 are really very different games. Otherwise, it turns out that someone has never played the fourth game (ranked 29th), but is an ace in the third game (ranked 2nd). What is the justification for a bonus here? Or, the bonus could be introduced within a single tournament, for example, the World Cup. Here, you can award bonuses from stage to stage because it's a single entity.

Added 4 minutes later

Greetings, Gentlemen,
I will express my opinion on this matter:
1) The Kamikaze VS Fireball debate: I support the latter.
This quote very well illustrates my opinion:

Message from Fireball
Therefore, the ranking needs more logic and less of subjective perception.

And who says I'm against this – I completely agree. How does my option not fit this interpretation???