Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

Actually, the bonus will range from almost 0 (if players conduct the tournament in a completely uninspired way) to 50, if they perform twice as well as expected. In any case, even the sum of the linear component and the bonus will be less than the non-linear one. If you've noticed, the results of the leaders are almost always the same (fluctuations are around 1/10 of the total rating). In the grand scheme of things, this isn't too important. Iron, in my opinion, has more than earned first place in the overall ranking due to his activity and consistent results. Wouldn't you prefer that fewer tournaments always result in more points than more tournaments?