Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

to Fireball and AlexeyPank
Regarding the bonus, I want to note that its introduction is generally a positive factor, but its size should be adequate (otherwise, the linear component is almost twice as small as the bonus). Also, the principle of aging could be used.
And regarding the ratio of positional and result-based components, I agree with Alexey: the result (the criterion by which the winner is determined) should play the dominant role.

Added 3 minutes later

In a multi-stage tournament, a player should not be penalized for the fact that their favorite version is not played on the portal, and the winner should always have the same rating.

Moreover, the bonuses you propose reflect not so much the strength of the tournament, but rather how the player performed relative to themselves. Don't you understand this?

I absolutely agree with the respected Fireball. The bonus should be of a different nature – progress (or regress) relative to opponents, in any case.

And is it even worth giving bonuses for this?
In my opinion, it's unnecessary.

In my opinion, bonuses are needed.