Skip to content

One for all and all for one 6

User Avatar
#63
Auto-translated
Sanin
I believe the opposite: a larger number of participants leads to more balanced teams. But I don't like an even number because of frequent draws, which will be a hassle in the playoffs, so I will personally aim for 5 people per team, as last year. And only in case of a low quorum will there be 3. Four is unlikely.

I agree.

I wouldn't consider 3. Let's stick to 5, as last year; if that doesn't work, then 4.
Весна 2013.