Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
For understandable and repeatedly stated reasons, such things should either be implemented at the software level or not implemented at all. Moreover, the question of whether such a rule is necessary is debatable – in my opinion, there is nothing wrong with trying to find the right hero. If you have accumulated more gold and time, you have a greater chance of finding it, which is fair. But to introduce it in the middle of a tournament, completely ignoring the opinions of the participants, is beyond the pale. Moreover, it introduces even more uncertainty and provokes a lot of controversial situations. If you bought a leveled-up hero on a short timer and placed him in the chain, is that a technical exploit? Or if you bought him and used him to gain some advantages, is that a technical exploit? What if you bought him and killed an opponent's weak unit? Where is the line between what is allowed and what is a technical exploit? In general, I have nothing against Vik and his tournaments (quite the opposite, actually), but I am strongly against this particular rule.