Forum

Attempts to engage in a dialogue using the approach of “Wicc, I believe you are wrong” are doomed from the start. It is necessary either to clearly explain why I am wrong or to come up with an option that satisfies both parties.

You have been explained almost everything. Are you ready to break the gameplay of EVERY game by forcing players to monitor the levels of heroes arriving at the tavern, playing on the verge of tech loss, just to somehow smooth out a situation that arises in 1 game out of 1000 (which may not even require this)? Doesn't it seem unreasonable? Moreover, you decided to do this independently, and there were no complaints or grievances from participants.

Also, questions like:
- Why can't I buy a support unit that I leveled up, but my opponent killed?
- What should I do if I have two leveled-up heroes in two slots? etc., remain unanswered.

Plus, the punishment for violation is still vaguely defined. Like "well, I won't use tech loss here; the main thing is not to do anything extra," etc. I wrote an entire post about the good faith implementation of rules. Simply stating that “players are all reasonable and will understand what is good and what is bad, they will figure out themselves what can be done and what cannot” does not work in modern realities.