Here's an interesting point: all participants who decided to voice their opinion are against this change in the rules. But Vic doesn't care; he pushes his agenda regardless...
Alright, let me say a few words. In general, when both main heroes die (if it's obvious that these are indeed the main heroes), I don't like the idea of digging up these specific heroes from the fountain! But banning the purchase of other heroes, especially those of level 10+, also seems absurd to me! You might want to dismiss a well-developed hero for some strategically important idea, and it's not a guaranteed plus. There's a risk that your opponent will buy him, but you might buy him too. This is part of the game; there aren't always 100% mathematically sound solutions. We're not robots; we can't calculate everything. You made a mistake with your priority, and then it came back to you. Or, your opponent got a log earlier, and the decision was made to counter that, which was beyond your control. In short, there are many such moments; we shouldn't bring it to the point of idiocy, especially since I haven't been able to grasp the specific, clearly calculated argumentation for the need to ban it. I repeat, the conscious buyout of main heroes also seems wrong to me. Develop other good heroes and realize the advantage, instead of cheaply collecting Nats and giving everything to one hero!