Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I completely disagree with Antik and 13ga!!! In my opinion, if a map isn't on the forum, it should be posted – not everyone may know about its existence, and the more complete the list is, the better. The real question is whether the map is of good quality, and if so, then it should definitely be mentioned here.
The only thing that isn't really necessary is these kinds of comments in this thread because we need to discuss the map itself, not the problem that it's old – that's already a navigation issue (as I understand it, Antik and 13ga find it easier to search for maps by date, i.e., again, it's a matter of creating sections and changing the format for topic titles, which they discussed here: /topic/12489/)
... И древний лес, роскошен и печален, Блистает там воздушностью прогалин. Но между кедров, полных тишиной, Расщелина по склону ниспадала. О, никогда под бледною луной Так пышен не был тот уют лесной...