Auto-translated
Without a rating, many will not participate. So, there is only one way out – COUNT THE RATING.
You can simply divide tournaments into two types, and consequently, the rating as well. Like Grand Slam tournaments. And a separate rating for them.
Yeah, a Grand Slam tournament... :D
And what exactly do you mean by that? That, for example, in a "small tournament," the rating will also not be very high :), but in a "big" one, it will be better... Develop the thought or continue what you said ;)
Added 3 minutes ago
No, I still support the organizers' original point of view... to divide tournaments into official and unofficial... because there can be many such tournaments (anyone who wants can organize them), and regarding the unwillingness to participate in unofficial tournaments – you are all exaggerating... there are many people who play for fun or for other reasons.... for example, I play (when I have time) online just for fun (friendly matches) that most people don't even know about!!!
And I'm not the only one :smile13:
Yes, that's understandable. On the portal, everyone mostly plays for fun, not for recognition, but, damn, there are exceptions. What should be done with them: "if you don't want to, don't play"? And should we just destroy the idea of Grail tournaments?
That tournaments will be divided – that's for sure, but the question is, how much will they differ from each other?
"Единственное, что можно сказать с уверенностью об удаче - она изменит..."