dwp1970
Auto-translated
It seemed to me that he wanted the non-official tournament to be considered official:smile01: and he also expresses surprise as to why, despite playing promptly and having more points, he didn't get 1st place. In my opinion, it's obvious.
even though you use a lowercase letter.
It's unpleasant to respond to this "superhuman" who has zero human qualities but thinks that this is compensated for by his ability to play Heroes. After all, he's number 1. That should cover everything.
But I'll answer: you're mistaken
Added 4 minutes later
Please express your thoughts more clearly.
What exactly is wrong, and what should have been done in your opinion?
Everything is obvious; the doubts about the final result are precisely related to the fact that I ended up in 1st place, although, of course, I shouldn't have.
But in the end, a result must be determined.
Therefore, here's a suggestion: we calculate based on lost points, where I am clearly not first (I can provide a more detailed argument for this).
1st place: Vill, as he will undoubtedly beat everyone he has left to play against, and besides, it's unlikely that he can be accused of avoiding games.
2nd place: Dmitrik, as he is also ahead in terms of lost points, plus he has unplayed games, which are not a problem for him. And again, he has never been seen avoiding games.
And so on. The rest should simply be placed where they ended up.
P.S. Judges are given authority and are mainly chosen to make unpopular decisions in complex, controversial situations, and not just to count zeros and ones.
Otherwise, all tournaments would turn into a circus, as this one almost has