Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.
Iron, if you need help, I'll try to assist. But if the goal is to create another round in the arms race, forget it.
No. I said I'd leave after this and won't interfere until you and Fireball provide your final formula. Is that okay?
Added 1 minute ago AmberSoler;104189
But the secondary criterion cannot be ignored. You stated that it's not important. But gathering more resources (units, experience, etc.) in the same period as your opponent – isn't that an indicator of skill? You should get a bonus for that.
So, tie these indicators to a specific coefficient, BUT DON'T RELY ON THE RANKING. You'll immediately avoid the problem with cooperative play, definitely without any revolutionary changes on the forum. You took the easy way out. You just used the ranking, and that's it. It's easier than tying a bonus for a secondary parameter through some coefficients. If your formula's oscillator doesn't take the ranking into account, but does take secondary parameters into account, that would be good! In other words, you're considering secondary parameters in an easy way through a SUBJECTIVE ranking, but you're considering them in another way – not through the ranking