Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

Note that this method eliminates all contradictions and applies all calculation systems. No to cooperative play and yes to clan-based play.
The problem lies in the mechanism for calculating the clan rating, and it needs to be changed. I would also like to point out that there is no mention of the oscillator; it is not relevant at all. And if you believe that my approach is an attempt to fix a flaw in the oscillator calculation, then I agree with you – flaws are not needed, and that is why we are all thinking about this together. Here is a ready-made solution to all the problems. You asked to remove the flaw from the oscillator (secretly hoping that it was impossible), and I offered you a way. A time-tested method.
What do you say?
I suggested a way to eliminate THIS flaw. Now you have no reason to be so stressed... Are you happy? :)

Here is an example:
1st place - Player 1
2nd place - Player 2 (cooperative)
3rd place - Player 3 (cooperative)
4th place - Player 4 (cooperative)
5th place - Player 5
...
10th place - Player 10
In this example, Player 1 overtakes the cooperative and receives his well-deserved 100 rating points. If there were no cooperative, all three players in the alliance would still be behind... And where are the promised points upward?:confused:
Also, for any position: if a player overtakes the best player in the cooperative, then the cooperative has no effect on his rating. But if he falls behind the leader of the cooperative, then he loses significantly in rating...