Happy Life
Auto-translated
S night
4 -> plus one for the quality of the artwork; I'm not very interested in the art itself;
3 -> decent.
Albert
3 -> the artwork is okay, the guy is generic;
3 -> mech;
3 -> in October 2017, it doesn't seem as terrible anymore, but that's because I haven't faced three sarcophagi in a row five times in a while.
Nephtys
2 -> dragon summoner/catacomb tier; could have given it a higher score for the exposed skin, but no;
4 -> borderline three;
2 -> "interesting," but fundamentally flawed and awkward design, on par with D-Shift.
Eidolon
3 -> completely ugly, but the concept is interesting, so okay (the evolved artwork is better);
3 -> similar to the previous one;
1 -> I've seen a few decent uses, but it's almost unplayable.
Daria
5 -> simply one of the best girls in Shadowverse ever; I've always liked her;
5 -> I wanted to nitpick and lower the score for the English voice acting, but I won't; I don't even play with it anymore;
4 -> despite the whining from internet users and accusations of being brain-dead, it was the first rune deck that was interesting to play, and it required more skill than a DE mid-sword or face-sword.
Teena
5 -> another one, in both artworks;
5 -> I wanted to grimace and give her a four, but since I gave Daria a five, I'll have to do the same here;
2 -> luckily, she was relevant for at least one expansion. Still decent in the arena.
Anne
4 -> good;
4 -> I really (really-really) don't like her first artwork; otherwise, it's good;
4 -> I like her and her friend in the arena.
Squall Lancer
3 -> I used to dislike the artwork, then it became okay, but the basic one is better;
3 -> decent;
3 -> decent.
Khawy
1 -> no, never and under no circumstances;
3 -> decent;
4 -> as a Dragoncraft player, I want to give it a one, but that would be unfair. In reality, without the pool of Nephtys, the card is quite mediocre.
Maid
2 -> I've already expressed my opinion about her in previous contests; it's a type of artwork that I really dislike;
4 -> good;
2 -> almost vanilla 5-6.
Necroassassin
2 -> the girl is okay, but I agree with Ples that the anatomy is simply atrocious;
4 -> good;
4 -> sort of balanced (not quite).
Feena
1 -> very, very bad;
3 -> "objectively" not bad, but her screams for months cost me many liters of blood from my ears (and my ass when forest enthusiasts abused their broken card);
2 -> evolved hog plus a completely uninteresting ability.
Demoness
4 -> I've always liked her;
4 -> borderline three, quite repulsive (creepy-uncomfortable), but I'll give it a higher score because it's unique;
1 -> garbage.
Lyrial
3 -> a very good girl, but the artwork is very imperfect;
5 -> I won't be stingy;
5 -> I didn't understand her purpose when the angel for 3 mana or the fire lizard for 2 mana existed, but then I realized: an excellent and balanced silver card for 2 mana, can't complain.
***
Magic >>> spells (obviously).
4 -> plus one for the quality of the artwork; I'm not very interested in the art itself;
3 -> decent.
Albert
3 -> the artwork is okay, the guy is generic;
3 -> mech;
3 -> in October 2017, it doesn't seem as terrible anymore, but that's because I haven't faced three sarcophagi in a row five times in a while.
Nephtys
2 -> dragon summoner/catacomb tier; could have given it a higher score for the exposed skin, but no;
4 -> borderline three;
2 -> "interesting," but fundamentally flawed and awkward design, on par with D-Shift.
Eidolon
3 -> completely ugly, but the concept is interesting, so okay (the evolved artwork is better);
3 -> similar to the previous one;
1 -> I've seen a few decent uses, but it's almost unplayable.
Daria
5 -> simply one of the best girls in Shadowverse ever; I've always liked her;
5 -> I wanted to nitpick and lower the score for the English voice acting, but I won't; I don't even play with it anymore;
4 -> despite the whining from internet users and accusations of being brain-dead, it was the first rune deck that was interesting to play, and it required more skill than a DE mid-sword or face-sword.
Teena
5 -> another one, in both artworks;
5 -> I wanted to grimace and give her a four, but since I gave Daria a five, I'll have to do the same here;
2 -> luckily, she was relevant for at least one expansion. Still decent in the arena.
Anne
4 -> good;
4 -> I really (really-really) don't like her first artwork; otherwise, it's good;
4 -> I like her and her friend in the arena.
Squall Lancer
3 -> I used to dislike the artwork, then it became okay, but the basic one is better;
3 -> decent;
3 -> decent.
Khawy
1 -> no, never and under no circumstances;
3 -> decent;
4 -> as a Dragoncraft player, I want to give it a one, but that would be unfair. In reality, without the pool of Nephtys, the card is quite mediocre.
Maid
2 -> I've already expressed my opinion about her in previous contests; it's a type of artwork that I really dislike;
4 -> good;
2 -> almost vanilla 5-6.
Necroassassin
2 -> the girl is okay, but I agree with Ples that the anatomy is simply atrocious;
4 -> good;
4 -> sort of balanced (not quite).
Feena
1 -> very, very bad;
3 -> "objectively" not bad, but her screams for months cost me many liters of blood from my ears (and my ass when forest enthusiasts abused their broken card);
2 -> evolved hog plus a completely uninteresting ability.
Demoness
4 -> I've always liked her;
4 -> borderline three, quite repulsive (creepy-uncomfortable), but I'll give it a higher score because it's unique;
1 -> garbage.
Lyrial
3 -> a very good girl, but the artwork is very imperfect;
5 -> I won't be stingy;
5 -> I didn't understand her purpose when the angel for 3 mana or the fire lizard for 2 mana existed, but then I realized: an excellent and balanced silver card for 2 mana, can't complain.
***
Magic >>> spells (obviously).
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
