No offense to Amber, but it seems to me that the idea is "far from sound" - here you are personally talking about KOLBAZER, yes - the opponent plays with you on "equal terms and under the same conditions", but isn't that what usually happens? - that no one is deceiving anyone? And you say personally to him, KOLBAZER, - "well, go for it..." - I can understand, of course, that a person needs to be prompted to act, but it could have been expressed in other words...
And at the moment my proposal was simply mentioned in passing, because the conversation turned to this... And I think if everything is organized properly, it could find support... That's all.
