I found a quote from AmberSoler :)
---
The only question is whether the ideology behind the rating will become a victim of its own illusions...
---
Don't use words without referencing the original source - if you're quoting, indicate where it's from. That's the first thing. And I don't understand why you're linking my words to an oscillator? Just because you want to show off the "advantages" of your calculation method again? It seems like you're very doubtful, since you keep advertising it tirelessly... Iron, don't confuse concepts and don't try to mislead people...
Added 7 minutes later
Of course, at first I wanted to take many things into account there, such as the location, the strength of the tournament, the number of people, the complexity of the map, and the permissible limits. But as I thought about one thing or another, I came up with many situations where the system failed, and I gradually discarded parameters one by one. In the end, there was NOT A SINGLE ONE left.
Your idea is clear and will be considered. In addition, there are others. There is no need to reject them for contrived reasons. Please answer to the point, and not just throw words around as you usually do.
