Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
No, it's exactly like that. Basically, in the first rounds, almost all players will have to play 2 games in 3 weeks. Closer to the 1/4 stage, there is a high probability that different players will be in different brackets, so there will be 2 weeks per game (not for the entire round, of course). If a situation arises where there are many of the same players in two brackets (after all, it's a skill-based template), I will revise the deadlines.
Added 9 minutes ago Wicc
It's better the other way around, to give more time to play to all participants, and less to the "daddies."
I am now trying to move away from the format of "giving more time to play" towards determining the winner faster. That's why I'm trying to avoid boring group stages. It's easy to just play now in fun matches. Increasing the number of battles is so that in the later stages it is not so frustrating to lose due to a block or a "chocolate" (powerful artifact) from the opponent, but there is an opportunity to make up for it. This will not greatly affect the determination of the winner, but it will be psychologically easier.
Dirty_Player
