Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

From my example, it is clear that if Player 1 did not participate in the Tournaments, none of the bottom four players would still receive any bonus to their rating, either for their placement or for the number of players in the Tournaments. They would receive the same as in the example!!! You could argue that the next Tournaments will be on a more difficult map. And then, a player of the same strength as Player N1 will receive a lower rating simply because achieving a result in three days is practically impossible there. But in that case, you won't be able to do anything in your systems or in the one you are developing. Because then you need to consider the DIFFICULTY coefficient of the map, and nothing else will help. And you are ignoring it, because it is PRACTICALLY impossible to derive the difficulty coefficient of the map, and you yourself wrote about this, which I basically agree with. The only conclusion is: try not to miss the Tournaments :)

Added 1 minute ago

Now calculate the rating for a Tournaments where the results are as follows:
Player 1 - 89 days
Player 2 - 130 days
Player 3 - 170 days
Player 4 - 211 days
Player 5 - 400 days (a difficult case)
And compare the two Tournaments.

Show me at least one real Tournaments where the leader completed it in 89 days, and I will proceed with the calculations :) And if you substitute Player A - 10 days into your table, calculate it yourself. The rating will be realistic and will show that there was more or less one strong player in the Tournaments - the rest are beginners. And the fact that Player A will receive a lower rating than Player 1 from the previous Tournaments, then you should CALCULATE the difficulty coefficient of the map. And I'll see how you go crazy :) Just like with choosing your comparison coefficient of player strength, taken NOT OUT OF THIN AIR