Sacred Haven of Debauchery

)

Am I right in understanding that this is a deliberate ignoring of an obvious truth in favor of an ad hominem argument? Furthermore, is it vague and lacking any factual basis, relying instead on some emotional or associative aspect? How many moments would it take for an adequate person to skip the post and move on to a more effective and constructive line of thinking? This might have worked in seventh grade, but now there are different standards for conducting discussions.