Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.
If you don't take any of this into account (neither the map, nor the number of players), then the curve or straight line will emerge on its own, depending on the ratio of the players' results to the leader's result. Especially if you take an ideal player with 100 points as the leader, who we assume can complete any map in ONE day.
The leader completed it in 100 days, the underdog in 170, for example... And as a result, (if compared to the virtual completion in one day), both received approximately the same score towards the rating... :D No, the leader will get a point, and the underdog will get half a point... That's how it is! :D Iron, the rest didn't help... :) Calculate yourself what you are suggesting at first...
AmberSoler says that no numbers should be taken out of thin air, and then immediately assigns 50 points to the first random player at the tournament. :)
This is not a rating - it's the player's strength for calculating the tournament's boosting coefficient... These 50 points have nothing to do with the rating. You can give 5 points, you can give 500. The only question here is to compare the players with each other in terms of strength.
I understand that it's difficult to absorb so much information in one evening and write your comments... Nevertheless, read more carefully about what we are talking about here...