SandroXXL
Auto-translated
Many people say that 5 is Warcraft-like (in terms of graphics), but I don't understand why? Yes, the graphics are cartoonish, but there is a lush color palette, which Warcraft lacked; at maximum height, the image simply hurts the eyes, and the game lacks the fatalism found in Warcraft. The objects and buildings are also different. Units... You can only compare Night Elves with Dark Elves. I think the graphics aren't similar at all. Personally, I only regret the plot: I was expecting a return to the world of 3.
But I don't know.
There are units of levels 1-7 with upgrade possibilities, there are castles, the number of which increases with add-ons, and finally, there are very spectacular battles rich in tactical maneuvers—and this is exactly where the graphics make up for their shortcomings in exploration mode. But personally, I just can't accept the game; I tried playing it, then quit. Maybe I'm getting old, maybe it's just a matter of habit and 3 still seems better to me. But the general gaming style is also different, not like the one in 3.
But I don't know.
There are units of levels 1-7 with upgrade possibilities, there are castles, the number of which increases with add-ons, and finally, there are very spectacular battles rich in tactical maneuvers—and this is exactly where the graphics make up for their shortcomings in exploration mode. But personally, I just can't accept the game; I tried playing it, then quit. Maybe I'm getting old, maybe it's just a matter of habit and 3 still seems better to me. But the general gaming style is also different, not like the one in 3.
Просто еще один