Alex_R
Auto-translated
I agree... But the voter must provide a valid reason for their decision... And the votes whose justification is deemed "far-fetched" should not be counted in the final result... (don't ask "who will decide" - it's clear that this should be done by experts). If this option suits you, then we can consider that we have reached an agreement... :) Otherwise, I, for example, will be against it; the explanation is above. Lenin's "cooks at the helm of the state" have repeatedly proven that everyone should do their own job...
And regarding whether I agree with your terms... I might agree, but it seems that it's not up to the two of us to decide... this issue can be resolved without your proposal or without my consent. ;)
Added 5 minutes later
Provide a clear example using abstract results from an abstract tournament, showing how you will compare the values of these indicators within one (!) tournament and how you will ensure the absence of errors... How can you compare the strength of a tournament with the time it takes to complete it? In my opinion, the problem lies in the very formulation of the question, which is why I asked for clarification...
P.S. Everything can be compared... even a cow with a dog, and a dandelion with a helicopter!!!;)