Zybr
Auto-translated
I agree with ZYbr. Uninformative posts aren't always a bad thing, and there's nothing wrong with a newbie gaining reputation. For example, a topic: "Which unit do you like in the Human castle?" A person writes: "I like the crossbowman because he shoots twice." This is an uninformative post, but should it be deleted if it fully justifies the topic's title? Not everyone will describe: "I like the crossbowman because this unit has always helped me, it shoots twice and many times with its ability saved key battles for me when it was vital or simply necessary, therefore I choose only it and will not vote for anyone else."
My point is, many topics don't require an extensive answer. "Which unit in the castle...", "Which hero...", "Which spells...". When a newbie registers on the forum and starts posting in such topics, getting acquainted with the forum and gaining posts, there's nothing wrong with that. Of course, blatant violations should be punished.
P.S. In addition, usually the first phrase of a person in a topic is exactly as you said, and it's not necessarily that he's new; it also depends on his mood. I personally am for the integrity of the picture; before acting, you need to think about the consequences and the meaning of the action, so that you don't waste a "turn" on fixing it later:)
Added after 18 minutes
Here's another thought, maybe it's already been said, I haven't seen it, to make moderators temporary, for a certain period, then elect new ones, re-elect those who work well for a new term, and so on
Барон "Vampires"
Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!