Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.
What's the point of banning this fun? The only top player who seriously engages in "this" is Reddi. And even he manages to lose half of his games with a dug-up Grail, because it requires a ton of wasted moves. And for viewers on streams, I think it's fun to watch these digs.
But playing against a Grail that is favorably located on the starting respawn or a neighboring zone, when the opponent has Conflux or Tower, is really not fun at all. Why do this? What fun can there be in this, to flame the opponent? And what kind of reason is that, that it's fun for viewers to watch? A lot of viewers find it most fun to watch anarchy, judging by the chats, so should we just play all templates without rules? The viewers will find it fun.