OFB-11!

What kind of abuse could there be here? A mandatory time was announced before the tournament started; if you signed up, be ready to play. If you're not ready, why is that considered abuse? :smile32:

Let me explain: there are some particularly cunning participants who can play at different times, but first, they ask their opponent when they are available. After receiving the answer – that they are available every day except Saturday – they suddenly say, "Oh, I can only play on Saturday," and want a technical defeat for their opponent. Isn't that abuse?!!

Added 7 minutes later

Can you give a specific example of the abuse? How could anyone "abuse" such a wonderful idea?
It's sad. The first tournament was where almost all the scheduling problems were resolved at the Regulations stage, and then, after only one round, it stopped? :confused:
Kobra, I'm sure that providing any tool for scheduling will create controversial situations (or rather, it will highlight them, because controversial situations already exist objectively), but how did you come up with the idea that it's better to give technical defeats to both players, including the one who was ready to play? :smile32:

I already wrote that for those who can't agree in any way, I can assign an odd time, and if one player writes to me that they are always ready to play, and the other disappears or doesn't respond, then, of course, this is interpreted in favor of the first player. Don't worry, common sense hasn't been canceled :) it's just that the mandatory time on Saturday night is canceled, and complete freedom is given to agree on any time during these 2 weeks. I don't want to name the players right now; many already know who they are.