Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I decided to go see a film by the best director of our time, essentially the heir to Kubrick and simply one of the geniuses of our era, namely Dunkirk by Nolan. I wasn't deterred by the negative reviews of this film. After all, it's not the first time that haters have criticized the masterful and unparalleled films of the maestro; that's what haters do. Obviously, the masses simply couldn't grasp the greatness of his films and therefore spoke ill of them.
So, I went and saw the film. I find myself in a very difficult position trying to find words to describe this cinematic masterpiece, much like Locken after watching Prometheus. The only thing that remains after the film is the thought: "If he had filmed it about the USSR in World War II, half of the audience would recognize it as a masterpiece telling the truth, and the other half would accuse him of Russophobia and disrespect for veterans. Would British and French patriots react similarly?" That's basically it.
There's no Hathaway, no Joker, no character development, almost no positive characters, and, by the way, no Germans either. I'm glad I saw this film in the cinema – at least I heard the BOOM BOOM of the bombs exploding in the theater; without that, the film is completely empty.
Where do we go? Where do we end up when we save the world?