Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
In my opinion, the best course of action would be to replay the disputed matches. Removing responsibilities as an organizer is not the best solution; you should bring the tournament to a conclusion, as everyone has already played and tried their best. Also, I believe the poll is not entirely accurate. It only offers extreme measures, but you could add an option like "Replay the disputed matches" or "Annul only the disputed games of the tournament," but not the entire tournament. I admit, I voted for annulment and now regret it, but it's clear that leaving everything as it is is also not a good idea, and while you're running the tournament, it's not the time to earn a ban. I've already indicated what I believe is the optimal solution, so that, as they say, everyone is satisfied, and no one is harmed.