Skip to content

Dialogues with Moderators

User Avatar
#625
Auto-translated
Is it fair to award a user 100 points for discussing the actions of moderators in a situation where there is essentially no one to complain to and 50 points for fabricated insults? Why not resolve this situation by showing some professionalism instead of creating a bad reputation for the forum?

Reviewing this episode, I can highlight the following:
a) Personally, I don't see any insults in these two messages, but if you want to find them, you can even find them where they don't exist. The only difference is that the moderator can take action against the user, but the user cannot take action against the moderator.
b) In this message, the actions of the moderator are not being discussed as such; rather, a fact is stated (the reason why a certain user is unable to perform certain actions).
c) Since there is no administrator on the forum, there is nowhere to complain about the moderator, which means that the last word always remains with him (even if he is wrong).

With the exception of the social section and the third Heroes section, the forum is now almost dead and is going through far from its best times. Throwing around points, blocking non-malicious users, and creating a bad reputation for the forum is not the best way to help it.
Couldn't we show some flexibility?