Skip to content

Posts from Power Buildings Auto-translated

5.0 (1 rating)
Open
What kind of warriors do you hire when playing as the Faction of Force?
101 voters
Single choice
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
In reply to Пандора
User Avatar
#211
Auto-translated
Pandora;98276
It's no problem for a Barbarian hero to go into battle. It's his direct duty.
That's true!!!:smile01:
Any doubts?:smile10: :smile10: :smile10:
С самого начала позаботься о своем месте в жизни, чтобы не уподобиться маятнику. /Херберт. Ф./
Клан: "Смертельный Альянс" - "Mortal Alliance"
In reply to OptiMAL
User Avatar
#212
Auto-translated
how interesting! what other purpose could a Barbarian have if not to engage in combat?
In reply to Пандора
User Avatar
#214
Auto-translated
Pandora;98285
What's so interesting about that? What else is a Barbarian good for if not for fighting?
Of course, Barbarians are only good for combat, but they are still weak in the first 5 levels. The army should help, but it's... unique, let's say.


Барон
"Vampires"

Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!



In reply to OptiMAL
User Avatar
#215
Auto-translated
Playing against neutral creatures in reasonable numbers and at appropriate levels is fine. Therefore, in the early stages, the Barbarian probably develops faster... He gathers resources and builds up his Castle.
In reply to Пандора
User Avatar
#216
Auto-translated
Pandora;98419
He performs well against neutral creatures in reasonable numbers and at appropriate levels. Therefore, in the early stages, the Barbarian probably develops faster... He gathers resources and builds up his Castle.
The Barbarian levels up quickly in the early stages, and only the Ranger of Nature can keep pace with him. But the Ranger has it easier, as he is assisted by wolves and fairies, while the Barbarian only has centaurs.


Барон
"Vampires"

Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!



In reply to Zybr
User Avatar
#217
Auto-translated
ZYbr;98449
The Barbarian levels up quickly in the early game, and only the Ranger is on par with him. But the Ranger has it easier because he is helped by wolves and fairies, while the Barbarian only has centaurs.
What about Berserkers? They may be a bit slow, but they partially compensate for this with double damage and decent health for the first level.
In reply to BASON
User Avatar
#218
Auto-translated
BASON;98484
What about Berserkers? They might be a bit dim, but they partially compensate for it with double damage and decent health for a first-level unit.
Well, Berserkers die quickly; they're only good for saving up for the final battle. Otherwise, they get taken down easily or just killed outright...


Барон
"Vampires"

Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!



In reply to Zybr
User Avatar
#219
Auto-translated
But the conversation started with the fact that the Barbarians develop faster at the beginning. And that's quite enough for the early game!
In reply to BASON
User Avatar
#220
Auto-translated
BASON;98591
But the conversation started with the fact that Barbarians develop faster at the beginning. And that's quite enough for the early game!
That's right... the Barbarian hero takes the hit and retreats (if they have few hit points left), while the Berserkers attack without taking damage... you can vary the tactics...:smile19:
In reply to Alex_R
User Avatar
#221
Auto-translated
But berserkers always rush forward; they don't care who's in front, whether it's archers, tougher infantry, or someone else. Here, you need to decide whether to support them and expose your hero, or watch as they get slaughtered, but at least they'll eliminate the remaining weak enemies from a distance.
P.S. Against most archers, you'll still have to move forward, although some of them seem to approach on their own, probably because they want to get what's coming to them sooner:D


Барон
"Vampires"

Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!



In reply to Zybr
User Avatar
#222
Auto-translated
So, shooting twice with a bow isn't powerful?
Молчал так долго, что забыл о чём именно
In reply to AzteC3
User Avatar
#223
Auto-translated
AzteC3;99525
Yeah, but isn't shooting twice with a bow a powerful ability?
No, it only works against neutral creatures, and against a hero, your two shots will deal 20-30 damage. Without magic, it will be difficult.


Барон
"Vampires"

Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!



In reply to OptiMAL
User Avatar
#224
Auto-translated
A standalone battle is just a nice bonus, nothing more. It's great against a level 1 hero, but not against an archmage.
In reply to Пандора
User Avatar
#225
Auto-translated
Pandora;99630
A ranged attack is just a nice bonus, nothing more. It's great against a level 1 hero, but not against an archmage.
I disagree; if the archmage is in its pure form (like Bohb), then a ranged attack is very useful.


Барон
"Vampires"

Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!