Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
There is only one nuance – what is the true motivation behind your actions? Everything else is just a way to achieve a goal, and there are indeed many of them, but there is no need to pay attention to them in advance. You can always distinguish one from the other based on the facts. Don't overcomplicate things.
IronAxe;98200
Well, see, there are so many nuances. No matter how insignificant they may seem, they exist. Or maybe Ataman doesn't share this point of view at all, and in his Tournaments, THESE NUANCES are prohibited?? Or are they simply NOT YET REFLECTED in this particular rule??
IronAxe;98197
This is all clear. But if life forces you to first flee from this mixed army and you can explain why, and then you just need to break through and finish off these neutrals, and there will be a justification for everything – then it means you can, or am I understanding correctly?
As you can see, the rules FORBID weakening non-upgraded neutral armies... That is, regardless of the goals, they cannot be weakened.
Comrades! All your discussions have been moved to the topic: Tournament Matters. Please refrain from posting similar messages in the tournament topic. Otherwise, all participants in the discussion will receive warnings.
Do you accept Ukrainian citizens? ...:smile10: We'll be fighting the Japanese :D
If you fight the Japanese, we'll call in the Chinese, and you'll be fighting 1 against 30 :D Alex_R;98059
to Kamikaze, how much did you sell #10 to Tane for?;)
She promised "something nice" for ten. Now "number 11" is for sale - $200
Added 3 minutes later AmberSoler;98148
Actually, this map is called "Adventures of Gelu v.1", the author is Best wariorr, and it was taken from HeroesPortal.net (the map has been slightly adapted by the host for the current tournament, with a couple of quests added, making the plot somewhat more diverse).
What does Sniper have to do with it? :) He misled everyone, especially the tournament organizer. I think we should just correct the incorrect authorship on the first page and give someone a reprimand in their personal file for attempting to claim someone else's property... :D Just this once...
I also wondered when I opened the map. :confused: It seemed like Sniper had a different one!!! Now it's clear, it's Adventures of Gelu. :p
As you can see, the rules FORBID weakening non-upgraded neutral armies... That is, regardless of the reasons, they cannot be weakened.
But, as you can see, AmberSoler misunderstood this when reading your rules, because you don't emphasize there that this prohibition doesn't allow for any reasonable explanations or exceptions. Now, I hope he understands that in your tournaments, you cannot retreat from a mixed army if, during this attack, the stacked unit was not completely destroyed. That is, no reasonable explanation for weakening will work. Even if you leave this weakened mixed army alive until the end of the game. Is that correct? P.S. However, I understand that in AmberSoler's tournaments, this rule will be worded differently?? In AmberSoler's rules, it is implied that sometimes, if the TRUE MOTIVATION for weakening a mixed army convinces with a reasonable explanation that you don't need to weaken the army, but simply need to retreat to the Fortress, then such an exceptional action is PERMITTED. This is where the discrepancies in the rules arise, when in some Heroes 3 tournaments we read one thing in the rules, and in others - something else.
Now, I hope it's clear to him that in your tournaments, you can't run away from a mixed army if, during that attack, the mixed unit wasn't completely destroyed. That is, no reasonable explanation for the weakening works. Even if you leave this weakened mixed unit alive until the end of the game. Correct?
Correct. IronAxe;98238
PS. However, I understand that in AmberSolera's tournaments, this rule will be worded differently?? The rules for AmberSolera imply that sometimes, if the TRUE MOTIVATION for weakening a mixed army convinces with reasonable explanations that you don't need to weaken the army, but simply needed to run to the fortress, then such an exceptional action is PERMITTED.
This is the organizer's right. In the end, everyone still plays with the SAME rules.
So, this is my first tournament, and I hope it won't be the last. By the way, creating a separate thread as a compilation of rules for the tournament is a good idea. The rules are mostly repeated anyway.
to Ataman
And in this tournament, is there only one stage involving capturing a castle, or will there be other stages as well?
She promised "something nice" for ten dollars. Now she's selling "item number 11" for $200.
:eek: :eek: :eek: :D :D Wow! I'll be sure to keep up with the news!!! Vitalik - when did I promise you something like that?;) You've been stubbornly not talking to me for several days - and now this turns out!! Alright, hang in there!!!!:D :D :D :D
Если тебе не везёт в жизни, - играй в какую-нибудь другую игру:rolleyes: Лидер клана "Из многих единое" Приключения – это сплошные неприятности, только про них почему-то потом интересно вспоминать...
AmberSoler, how did you read this point? I read it like this: ...in one day. Or does it mean on the first day?
I didn't read this point, I wrote it a long time ago... :D It means - he came and dug it out on the same day... And don't ask - "Is it possible?", I'll answer - "It's possible". But I won't tell you how... :D
Added 2 minutes ago Dubrovin Pavel;98324
Thank you for the advice! And I chose the avatar from the existing ones in the control panel - just because I like playing with this character.
An avatar is a symbol that reflects your essence (in your opinion) and that your interlocutors use to "identify" you... That's how... ;)
I didn't read this point, I wrote it a long time ago... :D What I mean is - he came and dug it up on the same day... And don't ask - "Is that possible?", I'll answer - "It's possible." But how - I won't tell you... :D
Why do you always speak in riddles?? Explain it like a normal person!!! Not everyone is as smart as you!!! By the way, I've noticed such statements not only from you but also from IronAxe. To the point - WHERE DID HE COME FROM???