Posts from Evaluating archers.
Based on what criteria should they be evaluated? If based on strength, then the first place should definitely go to the Titans. Cyclops are next, then Liches. Then monks. It gets more complicated after that, but everyone will still rank them differently.
Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.
:smile13: :smile13: :smile13: :smile13: :smile13:
I definitely prefer monks and liches, but I'm not going to argue with the power of titans. As for cyclops, I think they are only useful as catapults, and I don't see any other use for them.
8. Archer
No exaggeration – this is already an insult! He named everyone, and called the HIGH ELVES "archers," which is offensive... Everyone shoots arrows :D
Yes, elves will still be higher than "spirits" :D
lizard
orc<><>
medusa is weaker than a mage
fanatic is weaker than an archlich
It's very simple – the higher the archer's level, the better he is.
Lizard
Orc<><>
Medusa is weaker than a Mage
Fanatic is weaker than an Archlich
Almost everything is correct...
Only, an Elf is not weaker than an Ice Mage.
Almost everything is correct...
Only, the Elf doesn't lose to the Ice Golem.
1. Titan
2. King-Cyclops
3. Queen-Medusa