Skip to content

Posts from Quiz Auto-translated

5.0 (1 rating)
User Avatar
#821
Auto-translated
Nothing at all.



And now for a serious riddle, though I think it's quite easy. I took a photo of it from my book, but there are tons of variations of this riddle.

А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#822
Auto-translated
Judy is acting like a mob boss because she's making excuses and hiding behind her authority.
User Avatar
#823
Auto-translated
Well, it's a simple task, purely based on logic. I actually enjoy these kinds of puzzles, but I'm feeling a bit lazy right now.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#824
Auto-translated
I also enjoy these kinds of puzzles, and I often feel too lazy to solve them. At some point, I just got tired of searching for the puzzle.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#826
Auto-translated
Margaret stole the wallet. Execute Margaret!!!

Added 1 minute ago
Although, no. She couldn't have done that...

Added 2 minutes ago
Execute Judy!!! Evidence will be provided later, if needed...

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#827
Auto-translated
Judy
Всё не так плохо как Вы думаете. Всё намного хуже!
User Avatar
#828
Auto-translated


Well, hmm... Whoever posts the explanation first gets to choose.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#829
Auto-translated
Lilian didn't do it because if she had, both her first and second statements would be false, which is impossible. Therefore, Theo didn't do it either. This means that her third statement is a lie. So, Theo's first and third statements are true, and his second statement is false, and Margaret didn't do it. Margaret's first statement is true, and her second statement is also true, because David's third statement is false, and therefore his second statement is true.

Added after 45 seconds
Therefore, Margaret's third statement is a lie.

Added after 33 seconds
And since the second statement is true, Judy is guilty.

Added after 53 seconds
Consequently, her third statement is true, and her second statement is also true, and her first statement is false.
Всё не так плохо как Вы думаете. Всё намного хуже!
User Avatar
#830
Auto-translated


Yeah, something like that. Go ahead and ask.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#831
Auto-translated
Lilian didn't take it because if she did, then statements 1 and 2 would be false, which is impossible.

If Theo took it, then statements 10 and 12 would be false, meaning he didn't take it.

Margaret didn't take it because otherwise, statements 13 and 14 would be false.

If statement 15 is true, then statements 8 and 9 would be false, which is impossible. Therefore, statement 15 is false, and statements 13 and 14 are true.

Added 1 minute later
Hermit
Lilian didn't take it because if she did, then both her first and second statements would be false, which is impossible. This means Theo didn't do it either. As a result, her third statement is a lie.
That's not true; the second statement could be a lie.

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

In reply to Драккошка
User Avatar
#833
Auto-translated
Drakkosha


By the way, am I the only one who doesn't see when posts were edited?:smile32:

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#834
Auto-translated
In my opinion, only modders can see it right now.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#835
Auto-translated
Actually, I had another idea on how to prove this:
Let's say the statements that they didn't do it are:
Lillian - a,
Judy - b,
David - c,
Theo - d,
Margaret - e.

Judy's dad is rich - f,
Margaret knows who - g,
David doesn't know Margaret - h,

Each variable can be equal to 1 if it's true or 0 if it's false. Then, based on their statements:

Lillian a+a+(1-d)=2
Judy b+f+g=2
David c+h+(1-d)=2
Theo d+(1-e)+d=2
Margaret e+(1-b)+(1-h)=2
a+b+c+d+e=4

From the first equation, a=1, d=1
From the fourth equation, e=1
From the third equation, c=1, h=1
Therefore, from the fifth equation, b=0
Judy is guilty.
Всё не так плохо как Вы думаете. Всё намного хуже!
In reply to Hermit
User Avatar
#836
Auto-translated
Hermit

Let's say the statements that they didn't do it are:
Lillian - a,
Judy - b,
David - c,
Theo - d,
Margaret - e.

Judy's dad is rich - f,
Margaret knows who - g,
David doesn't know Margaret - h,

Each variable can be equal to 1 if it's true or 0 if it's false. Then, based on their statements:

Lillian a+a+(1-d)=2
Judy b+f+g=2
David c+h+(1-d)=2
Theo d+(1-e)+d=2
Margaret e+(1-b)+(1-h)=2
a+b+c+d+e=4

From the first equation, a=1, d=1
From the fourth equation, e=1
From the third equation, c=1, h=1
Therefore, from the fifth equation, b=0
Judy is guilty.
Hermit, where were you when they were solving the journalists' polls in the mafia games???:D:D:D

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).